On January 30, 1969, several hundred students occupied the Administration Building to protest the University's decision not to reappoint Marlene Dixon, an assistant professor in the Department of Sociology and Committee on Human Development. Administrators and staff evacuated their offices and continued their work in other University Buildings. On February 14, 1969, students voted to end their sit-in and leave the building. (The University of Chicago Photo Archive)
I was auditing a class on 18th c. poetry by Ned Rosenheim, who happened that year to be Chairman of the Committee of the Faculty Council. I wrote him a proposal for dealing with the situation inspired by Mathew Prior’s “An English Padlock”, a poem I had encountered in his class and liked.
Our children, who are brave and young, As Dylan has divinely sung cannot be kept from demonstration By the armed might of half the nation. Truth is a fire in their veins That burns to dust the feeble chains Of Prudence; Martyrdom’s their tool To end the draft or seize a school. Since this is now authentic truth By age observed of noble youth, Tell us, deans and scholars, tell us Why for punishment so zealous? What punishment that you command But knits more tight the rebel band? Will they, suspended for a year, Returning lend a chastened ear And bow before your throne in fear? Rather they’ll raise another band Around some still more wild demand, Fueled by revenge their righteous rage Will cover many a radical page passionate, disillusioned and sad Of paper stolen from the Ad[1]
.“My punishment’s more sure and fell They’ll not return, for I’ll expel” The very act will fork the dung From which another legion’s sprung. Cohorts will rise in every class And radicals will grow like grass. “We’ll not admit the longhaired few.” They’ll clip it for the interview. “Dear friend, is there no way you see To save the university Lest civil strife consume us quite?” There is but one. Give up the fight. Pardon the sinners, yield the city Put them on every damn committee. Let them join in the midnight search For funds to fuel some fresh research; Let them be roused at half past two By parents who intend to sue. Give in, give in, and let them play With files ... twenty hours a day. When the student committees that run the place for them Never can manage to raise a quorum, When bills aren’t paid and lights go out And angry parents come to shout, When the water faucets refuse to flow In dorms that are down to six below, When they’ve got what they asked for, When you’re sitting pretty, When student’s wince at the word “committee,” When they write to you (on the Riviera) Tell them that, if they double your pay, Guarantee an eight hour day, Paint your office, feed your canary, Provide an amorous secretary Who never heard of WITCH or WRAP[2] And likes to sit on her boss’s lap, You might consider and contemplate On some far distant, tentative date, Coming back to administrate.
Rosenheim liked the poem but:
Following the sit-in, photographs were taken by the University administration to document the condition of the interior of the building. In March 1969 the University suspended eighty-one students involved in the sit-in, expelled forty-two, placed three on probation, and fined one for the cost of a broken window.
A more realistic, if less entertaining, response.
[1] Administration building, occupied by the students.
[2] Women’s International Terrorist Conspiracy from Hell and Women’s Radical Action Project.
Past posts, sorted by topic
A search bar for past posts and much of my other writing
Are you planning to write about Dr. Hans Hermann Hoppe's thoughts on monarchy and democracy? Your critique of the anti-immigration "anarcho-capitalist counterfactuals" argument of Hoppe and the paleolibertarians influenced by him was very revealing.Ceteris paribus, can we say that privately owned governments, such as absolute monarchies and aristocracies, are better than democracies for libertarian purposes?And my second question. Could privately owned decentralized governments, such as city-states ruled by monarchies and aristocracies, be better than the great modern western democracies? I think Dr. Hoppe's argument works for stable and very small states. Because the motivations of such states to govern may be similar to the motivations of the owner of a private neighborhood or city in an anarcho-capitalist order. Because we can easily use the vote by foot option.
Love it! And I agree - let them be the adults for a few minutes. Ties back to your other post on giving opportunities for responsibilities