Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Handle's avatar

Handle's Law is, "The better the quote, the more likely it's apocryphal."

Paul Brinkley's avatar

I think your collection is much less egotistical than my collection of quotes that *I've* said, that I also don't recall borrowing from anyone else. A slice:

-- Not all religion comes labeled as such. --

-- If you argue with someone about what they're really thinking, you will lose. --

-- An argument over which political party is more corrupt is like an argument over whose house is more on fire. --

-- The bias of a source isn't just in the falsehoods it tells you, but also in the truths it leaves out. --

-- Bias happens *even when the source wants to avoid it*. It's inherent to the venue. There's only so many minutes in the program, inches on the broadsheet. Even a website, which one might think affords all the space one might need, has only so much you can put at the top before the reader loses interest. In the end, you are fighting for the audience's attention span, and any story that grabs it is at the expense of another. --

I am quite sure the insights from these were discovered earlier. (I could argue that *every* quotable quote necessarily has this property.) It makes me wonder if there is a database out there that attempts to extract the "key insight" of popular quotes, and index them on that insight, such that you could dig up quotes with insights that are close. Consider:

-- You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. --

-- You can lead a baker to dough, but you can't make him bake it. --

Similar insights, but perhaps not identical, but it'd be interesting if a database could retrieve insights by similarity. At best, all the ones I've seen index by keyword or author or "topic" - leading to quotes about fish that have nothing to do with fish, etc.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?