Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chartertopia's avatar

I heard of a trick to lessen the risks of luggage pilfering. Buy a starter pistol. They are cheap and small, have a solid barrel, but qualifiy as a firearm for TSA purposes. TSA policy then, probably still now, is that checked luggage with firearms must be locked with a lock that TSA does NOT have a key to; they either want to reassure the public of no tampering, or don't trust their own employees.

So bring the starter pistol in your luggage, go through the firearm process, and you have luggage which TSA cares about and is less likely to be robbed or stolen.

No idea if this is still valid. No idea what extra delays and hassles are involved.

Expand full comment
Ben Labowstin's avatar

My observation (in the EU at least) is that the time taken to load everyone's luggage on board the plane (and fuel, etc) is much greater than the time taken to load on all the people, so there is no saving to the airline in getting people to board more efficiently. Any time I've taken a flight, we have all boarded (slowly) and then sat around waiting anyway.

Also, I would much rather queue for slightly longer with my family (who will be sitting next to me), than be forced to separate from them in order to queue more efficiently alongside the person sitting directly in front of and behind me.

These two things combined mean that whilst there will be a lot of individuals wasting time on an inefficient queueing system, changing the system to suit them doesn't suit everyone, and doesn't end up benefiting the airline.

From the airline's perspective, as long as everyone is boarded by the time they need to leave, there is no cost to them for slow boarding. And I suspect that (especially when you account for people like me, who travel with family), forcing people to queue separately from the people they are sitting next to is not something that people are, on average, willing to pay much more for.

Expand full comment
57 more comments...

No posts