Discussion about this post

User's avatar
DLR's avatar

What I found annoying in the second book was that no parents, ever, show up to help their kids out the door at graduation. Why wouldn't they come, and bring all their friends, and help the kids get past the mals. It just makes no sense.

Chartertopia's avatar

I can think of two inconsistencies offhand. One is Eric Frank Russel's book "The Great Explosion", © 1961, expand from a short story © 1951, three years after Gandhi died, which matters because the short story mentions an invention "470 years back" which some other sentence would put in 1918 or thereabouts. Another statement says there has been space travel for 1000 years, way out of line. It has no real effect on the story itself, but it was jarring. I put it down to some leakage from a previous draft which no copy editor caught.

More disappointing was JK Rowling's Harry Potter books. I think she's a terrific writer who both kids and adults can read without it feeling dumbed-down or a slog of fancy words. (I hated the movies and their changes.) What I did not like about the books was the idea that there was no pattern to magic spells or potions. They were all just rote memorization of arbitrary sounds and ingredients.

Then I found "Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality" (https://hpmor.com/), which starts with the basic change of Harry's mother having more sense and getting her sister to make her attractive enough to snag a professor husband who imbues Harry with a strong rational curiosity, and who, for instance, gets Hermione to help him research what happens if you change spells ever so slightly, like stretching out vowels. Surprisingly, I found the writing pretty good, although probably not for readers as young as the originals, and apparently JK Rowling gave her permission as fanfic.

Mostly I can ignore internal inconsistencies as long as they don't directly make a mockery of the plot.

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?