Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Felix's avatar

What bothers me most about arguments over immigration control is not the hypocrisy of "My parents got here so I can keep you out", but that no one addresses the incredible bureaucracy and concomitant invasion of privacy required to control immigration. It would be simple enough to check every immigrant for contagious disease, even if that requires quarantining them for several weeks. But that would also forbid contagious citizens from entering. Immigration control requires national ID cars in some form or another, even if hidden as 50 individual state driver licenses. The Supreme Court has declared 100 miles within the borders to have a much weaker 4th Amendment than the rest of the country.

The only way to truly secure the border is to have a soldier every 50 or 100 feet -- 50 to 100 per mile, and by the time you allow for an 8 hour day, 40 hour week, 24 x7 coverage, vacations, holidays, and everything else, that's 250 to 500 soldiers per mile. 3000 mile northern and southern borders, 2000 mile east and west coasts. that's 10,000 miles, millions of soldiers, and anyone who thinks that is fiscally feasible, or can be corruption-free, is an idiot. Cut it back by a factor of 10, use cameras and drones to watch the border, you still need a lot of reserves to arrest all the interlopers.

Because no one wants to mention these things, we end up with a sorry system which doesn't stop illegal immigrants, costs a fortune, and tramples over the Constitution, and the two sides agree to such a status quo because no one wants to tell the truth and have an honest discussion.

Expand full comment
Dan Gilles's avatar

On the immigration issue, this book appears to support the “corrupt our culture” hypothesis: https://www.amazon.com/Culture-Transplant-Migrants-Make-Economies-ebook/dp/B0BCKYZ1VY/

“Over the last two decades, as economists began using big datasets and modern computing power to reveal the sources of national prosperity, their statistical results kept pointing toward the power of culture to drive the wealth of nations. In The Culture Transplant, Garett Jones documents the cultural foundations of cross-country income differences, showing that immigrants import cultural attitudes from their homelands—toward saving, toward trust, and toward the role of government—that persist for decades, and likely for centuries, in their new national homes. Full assimilation in a generation or two, Jones reports, is a myth. And the cultural traits migrants bring to their new homes have enduring effects upon a nation's economic potential.”

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts