I take the moral argument a different direction: private control of land is needed for wealth creation which benefits everyone so we want it even though it is theft of land from everyone else. The compromise is to pay everyone for the land they’re denied.
I take the moral argument a different direction: private control of land is needed for wealth creation which benefits everyone so we want it even though it is theft of land from everyone else. The compromise is to pay everyone for the land they’re denied.
I take the moral argument a different direction: private control of land is needed for wealth creation which benefits everyone so we want it even though it is theft of land from everyone else. The compromise is to pay everyone for the land they’re denied.
Have we established that it is theft?