Those are conclusions, not arguments. Why should anyone accept either? Consequentialism? Is there evidence that the Georgist approach would actually be superior? Is everyone entitled to make social changes they hope would improve society, including ones that contradict someone else's reforms?
Those are conclusions, not arguments. Why should anyone accept either? Consequentialism? Is there evidence that the Georgist approach would actually be superior? Is everyone entitled to make social changes they hope would improve society, including ones that contradict someone else's reforms?
Those are conclusions, not arguments. Why should anyone accept either? Consequentialism? Is there evidence that the Georgist approach would actually be superior? Is everyone entitled to make social changes they hope would improve society, including ones that contradict someone else's reforms?